The waves come in
The children jump and squeal
They run back to the beach
And back into the waves
They did this yesterday
And the day before
They did it last century
And the one before that
The land changes
Even the sea, a little
Life comes and goes
But the waves and the children
jump and squeal forever
Why I Love Linux
Linux is a computer operating system similar to Apple’s OS and Microsoft. It is free, but although you can usually get it without cost, the important thing is that it is free of limiting copyright restrictions1. You can get it from anyone and do anything with it without incurring the wrath of big companies or encountering limitations deliberately designed to make things difficult for you.
1 There are limitations but they are designed to prevent anyone from introducing restrictions, so you can do pretty much what you like with it as long as you acknowledge where it came from and don’t limit future users.
It is free. It is secure. It is fun. It is powerful. It is easy to install and to replace. On the very rare occasions when something goes wrong you can simply bung in another copy and carry on. It runs on cheap hardware. The applications that go with with it are legion, excellent and also free. I can’t actually think of any reason why anyone would use anything else.2
2Actually I can: Linux is not often pre-installed and you will need to find a copy and learn how to get it and install it. Also there are a few proprietary applications, and pieces of hardware, that you may be using that are dependent on one of the closed operating systems. If these are a problem to you it is worth seeking help and advice to wean yourself off of proprietary things that don’t work and take the plunge.
https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=major is worth look
https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php where you can buy a flash drive ready to install and will not need to do it ever again.
https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=major gives a good summary of what is available and advantages and disadvantages.
Android on most portable devices is a version of Linux.
Leave a Reply
Losing English Plurals to Māori Sensitivities
I love the Māori language, but I get a little miffed when I am told I am not allowed to pluralise words in English if they have a Māori origin.
An example is: Māori belong to Hapu which belong to iwi when in fact what is meant is that Māoris belong to Hapus which belong to iwis. [Māoris belong to sub-tribes which belong to tribes]
The argument is that the Māori language has no ‘s’ in it and therefore the word Māoris cannot be used.
My argument is that the Māori language has the very sensible arrangement of two definite articles, one singular and one plural [te and nga giving te wahine – a woman and nga wahine – women]. The English language however does not have this and so it usually needs its ‘s’ to pluralise. When a word is being used in English it becomes an English word and has no choice but to conform to English language conventions.
It seems rather insulting to both languages to say that Māori is so weak it cannot lend its words to other languages and that English is such a muddle that it can throw away its pluralisation rules.
Just saying.
Leave a Reply
Saving space with fewer gots
There are too many gots in the world
If you go through a piece of written or spoken language and remove the gots you will find that the clarity is seldom damaged and often enhanced. In fact it is almost everyone’s habit to add a got to every have regardless of whether it even makes sense.
Eg ‘Have you got any cake?’ The questioner almost certainly wants to know if you HAVE any cake. You have probably got cake on hundreds of occasions but that is no use if the cupboard is now bare. The question they really wanted to ask was ‘Have you any cake.’ Shorter simpler and more accurate.
What about ‘I have got to go.’ How does that differ from ‘I have to go.’ Minus a got and more accurate and precise.
Try taking the gots out of something you read, listen to, or say. You will be surprised how many can go and actually improve the quality of the language.
Leave a Reply
Voluntary Euthanasia
I believe that I have a right to a humane end to my life when I am ready for it. I would expect a doctor to be involved to make sure it is successful and painless and I think I will have to accept that there should be a third party to referee and make sure it is truly what I want and that my doctor is giving me wise advice. But why on earth would I want someone else, particularly a person confused by a christian upbringing telling me what I am allowed to do, when it cannot affect them or anyone else?
At present I am very happy and would like to live forever but I know I won’t. I will steadily deteriorate until I am a burden to myself, my family and society. When that happens I may want to ask to go. If I do, after a brief consultation I would expect to be killed. Why would I or anyone else want anything different? I might be in excruciating pain and begging to go. I might not know who I am or where I am and be in constant fear. Please, if I have asked to be euthanased when I reach that sort of despair – let me go.
The counter arguments seem to be:
1. We are religiously bound to live as long as we can. No, we are African apes. Once life has no value to us we are of less value than an a worm. Let us go.
2. We will put doctors under too much pressure or they may kill people unnecessarily. No, we trust doctors with our lives already – we have nothing better and there is no reason to believe our doctors will become incompetent or serial murderers because of euthanasia laws. there are already checks on medical practitioners.
3. There may be pressure from third parties/family to end a life prematurely. No, only people who request euthanasia while they are fit to ask (I do now) will be euthanased and there will be some sort of referee to make the final decision (usually this will be a trivially obvious).
4. Non-rectifiable mistakes will be made. Of course they will, they always are but it is not very hard to judge that someone who has accepted euthanasia is now in a state where life is not worthwhile. The mistakes will be insignificant compared to the premature suicides, horrible suffering and fear engendered by the lack of euthanasia law.
Please, lets have a sensible humane euthanasia law before I have to consider putting an early period to my life to escape a horrible slow lingering death.